Menyingkap Budaya Penyebab Fraud : Studi Etnografi Di Lingkungan Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37481/jmoi.v4i1.138Keywords:
Academic Fraud Culture, Fraud, Students, Academic PressureAbstract
Fraud is a harmful act committed either individually or collectively. Issues of fraud are not only found in the government sector but have also emerged in the field of education. This study aims to reveal the culture of academic fraud that leads to dishonest practices among students. This research adopts a qualitative approach, utilizing data collection techniques such as interviews, observations, and documentation. The results of the study indicate that in the Faculty of Economics and Business, the culture of fraud originates from human resources (students) who perceive dishonest behavior as common practice. Academic fraud is driven by the pressure to maintain high academic grades, the lack of supervision during examinations (especially when using smartphones or laptops), and the rationalization of fraudulent actions by students. These factors collectively contribute to the normalization of academic fraud among students.
References
Albrecht, W.S., Albretcht, C.O., Albretcht, C.C., dan Zimbelman, M.F. (2012). Fraud Examination, Fourth Edition. Mason, OH: South Western, Cengage Learning
Association of Certified Faud Examiners. (2014). Report To the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse: 2014 Global Fraud Study. Retrieved from http://www.acfe.com
Billy, B., Andrianus, A., Yuliati, R., & Adelina, Y. E. (2019). Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Perspektif Fraud Diamond. Ekspansi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan Dan Akuntansi. Https://doi.org/10.35313/ekspansi.v11i2.1 34
Budianto., Faujiah, Fatia Nur., Andini, Febriyanti., Rafles, Ginting. 2023. Menelisik Pemicu Perilaku Academic Fraud versus Accounting Fraud dalam Perspektif Fraud Triagle. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, Manajemen dan Akuntansi (Jebma). Volume : 3 | Nomor 2
Eriksson & McGee (2015). Academic dishonesty amongst Australian criminal justice and policing university students: individual and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 3(2).
Ginting, R., Yanto, F., Apriant, R., & Darmawan, Y. (2021). Akuntansi Forensik Dalam Mengungkapkan dan Menelisik Fraud: Studi Kasus Organisasi Nirlaba. Jurnal Audit Dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi, 10(2), 50–64
Mathew, Elizabeth., Ding Fa-Xiang , Naider, Fred and Mark E Dumon. 2013. Functional fusions of T4 lysozyme in the third intracellular loop of a G protein-coupled receptor identified by a random screening approach in yeast. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection vol. 26 no. 1 pp. 59–71, 2013
Moleong, L.J. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Murdiansyah, Isnan, Made Sudarma, dan Nurkholis. 2020. Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Magister Akuntansi Universitas Brawijaya). Jurnal Akuntansi Akrual, 2017: 121-133
Nurharjanti N.N. (2019). Ada Apa Dengan Whistle Blowing System. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ekonomi: Jurnal Akuntansi, Pajak Dan Manajemen, 7(14), 13–34.
Purnamasari, P. dan Amaliah, I. (2015). Fraud Prevention: Relevance to Religiosity and Spirituality in the Workplace. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 827–835
Sunaryo & Utami, H. (2021). Kecurangan pelaporan keuangan organisasi kemahasiswaan: perspektif crowe’s fraud pentagon theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 8(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v8i12021p51
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 KINERJA: Jurnal Manajemen Organisasi dan Industri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
