Factors Influencing Audit Judgment: Artificial Intelligence, Professional Skepticism and Compliance Pressure

Okdiani Darunifah; Cris Kuntadi

doi:10.37481/jmoi.v5i1.236

Authors

Okdiani Darunifah Perbanas Institute Jakarta
Cris Kuntadi Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37481/jmoi.v5i1.236

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Professional Skepticism, Obedience Pressure, Audit Judgment, Audit Quality

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into audit practices, increasing expectations for professional skepticism, and growing obedience pressure from clients, superiors, and regulators have significantly influenced the way auditors exercise audit judgment. In today’s complex business environment, audit judgment has become a critical determinant of audit quality, as auditors must evaluate large volumes of data while maintaining independence and objectivity. This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of AI, professional skepticism, and obedience pressure on auditors’ audit judgment. A qualitative research design was employed using a systematic literature review approach. Data were collected and analyzed from relevant auditing theories, professional standards, regulatory frameworks, and prior empirical studies. The findings indicate that AI functions as a supportive tool that enhances auditors’ access to relevant, reliable, and timely information, thereby improving the effectiveness and accuracy of audit decisions. Professional skepticism strengthens auditors’ critical thinking, prudence, and objectivity in evaluating audit evidence. However, obedience pressure may negatively affect audit judgment by encouraging compliance-oriented behavior that compromises professional independence. The study emphasizes the importance of balancing technological support, ethical values, and resistance to undue pressure to ensure high-quality audit judgments.

References

Abdullah, M. I., Zahra, F., & Hadi, S. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in audit decision-making: Enhancing risk assessment and evidence evaluation. Journal of Accounting Technology, 15(2), 45–63.

Akbar, R., & Kuntadi, C. (2024). Pengaruh Independensi Auditor, Profesionalisme Auditor Dan Etika Profesi Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Media Akademik, 2(5).

Ariany, V. (2025). The Impact Of Artificial Intelligence On Audit Quality And Auditor Judgement. COUNT, 2(3), 557-569.

Arens, A.A., Elder, R.J., & Beasley, M.S. (2020). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (17th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Boynton, W. C., Johnson, R. N., & Kell, W. G. (2006). Modern auditing: Assurance services and the integrity of financial reporting (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Budiadnyani, N. P., & Dewi, P. P. R. A. (2024). The moderating effect of audit experience. Journal of Applied Sciences in Accounting, Finance, and Tax, 7(2), 106–116.

DeZoort, F. T., & Lord, A. T. (2017). A review and synthesis of pressure effects research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 38, 1–20

Fahira, N.I., Kuntandi, C., & Azzahra, A. (2024). Pengaruh Penilaian Terhadap Audit Quality: Insentif Kerja, Pengalaman Auditor Dan Kompleksitas Tugas. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 2(2), 198-206.

Hardi, M., Akob, M., & Lalo, A. (2025). Professional skepticism as a mediator in audit judgment. Journal of Internal Audit Studies, 11(1), 33–49.

Irwanda, Y., & Kuntadi, C. (2024). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Pengetahuan dan Skeptisisme Profesional Terhadap Audit Judgement. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 2(6), 149-161.

Jakfar, A., & Supranata, M. (2025). Hubungan Independensi Auditor , Kompetensi Auditor dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan di KAP Jakarta. KINERJA Jurnal Manajemen Organisasi Dan Industri, 4(2), 153–159.

Kamal, M.H.K., Akob, M., & Lalo, A. (2025). The Determinants of Professional Skepticism in Shaping Audit Judgment at the Regional Inspectorate of Gowa Regency. SIMAK, 23(02), 136-160.

Kristin, F. J., Kuntadi, C., & Pramukty, R. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment: Tekanan Ketaatan, Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Dan Pengalaman Auditor. Jurnal Economina, 2(6), 1430–1437.

Kusumawaty, M., & Hari, K.K. (2022). Tekanan Ketaatan Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment. Balance: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 7(2), 146-157.

Messier, W. F., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Auditing & assurance services: A systematic approach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Republika. (2020). Audit skandal Jiwasraya diperluas. Jakarta: Republika.

Rwanda, T., & Kuntadi, D. (2024). Audit judgment and professional standards: An evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 19(2), 101–120.

Suleyman, M., & Bhaskar, M. (2023). The coming wave: Technology, power, and the twenty-first century’s greatest dilemma. New York: Crown.

Sahla, W.A., & Latif, D.M. (2023). Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage on Auditor Judgment. Indonesian Journal of Applied Accounting and Finance, 3(2), 91–104.

Sumartono, Ermawati, Y., & Rorong, T.M. (2022). Influence of experience and professional skepticism on audit judgement of government external auditors. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, 26(2), 211-223.

Wirjono, E.R., & Fridata, V.F. (2023). The Impact of Compliance Pressure, Task Complexity, and Auditor Expertise on Audit Judgment. Kinerja, 27(2), 248-264.